OTA virtual cards, the hidden cost hospitality can no longer ignore
This exclusive Op-Ed by James MacRae has sparked significant discussion around payment transparency, hidden transaction costs and the broader economics of OTA bookings, with many operators sharing their own experiences and concerns.
By James MacRae, Head of Payments at RMS Pay
For years, Australian hospitality businesses were unknowingly absorbing millions in inflated international card fees hidden inside Online Travel Agency (OTA) bookings.
Offshore-issued virtual credit cards were bypassing domestic interchange protections, leaving operators paying significantly higher transaction costs on what were, in many cases, domestic stays.
It became a major structural problem for the hospitality sector and one many operators had very little visibility into.
Read the latest print edition of AccomNews HERE
So in 2025, we submitted detailed transaction-level evidence to the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), highlighting the scale of offshore OTA virtual card costs across hospitality.
The submission formed part of the broader industry push for reform, with the RBA later moving to cap interchange fees on certain foreign-issued card transactions from 2027 and reduce the excessive costs attached to OTA virtual cards.
For hospitality businesses, this is a real win and the reforms are a significant shift.
The sector has been heavily focused on the burden of OTA commissions and distribution costs and paying far less attention to the payment economics embedded within those bookings.
Yet payments have quietly become one of the fastest-growing operational costs facing hospitality businesses, particularly as margins come under pressure from labour costs, insurance, utilities and rising distribution spend.
Through our transaction analysis, we could see just how widespread the issue had become. Around one in four payments processed through the platform involved OTA-issued virtual cards, with almost all of them issued internationally through offshore structures.
The data exposed a major structural imbalance within hospitality payments, with operators effectively subsidising offshore payment models they had little visibility or control over.
The issue was not simply that the fees were high. Many operators did not even realise they were paying international card rates on bookings made by Australian travellers staying at Australian properties. Offshore OTA payment structures were effectively sidestepping domestic protections while hospitality businesses absorbed the cost.
The RBA reforms finally brought transparency and regulatory pressure to a payment structure that had quietly inflated costs across the sector for years, a problem we had consistently highlighted through detailed evidence and industry advocacy.
By capping interchange fees on certain foreign-issued transactions, the regulator has acknowledged a long-standing imbalance that unfairly shifted excessive payment costs onto hospitality businesses. Across the sector, the savings are expected to be substantial.
But the reforms also signal something much bigger: payment economics can no longer sit quietly in the background while operators focus exclusively on occupancy and topline revenue.
A booking may look profitable on paper, but once OTA commissions, marketing spend and transaction costs are fully factored in, the margin can look very different.
Operators who fail to properly understand the economics underneath each booking channel risk making increasingly poor commercial decisions as operating costs continue to rise.
At the same time, the banning of surcharges will fundamentally reshape how operators recover card costs. Businesses will no longer be able to simply pass fees directly onto guests, meaning those costs will need to be built more strategically into pricing and distribution strategy.
And this is not just happening in Australia. Regulatory pressure around interchange, transparency and cross-border payment costs is building globally.
New Zealand is introducing similar reforms, the UK continues to revisit fee caps and competition concerns, and legal pressure around interchange continues to intensify in the United States.
Payment economics are becoming a far more important commercial issue within hospitality globally, particularly as operators search for new ways to protect profitability in an increasingly competitive market.
Hospitality has long focused on the visible costs of distribution while overlooking the payment economics hidden within OTA bookings.
The RBA reforms have now forced that issue into the open and operators who continue treating payments as a background operational cost risk falling behind in an increasingly margin-sensitive market.
About James MacRae
James MacRae is Head of Payments at RMS Pay and brings deep expertise across payments, fintech and hospitality technology, with previous leadership roles at Visa and ANZ. He has become a leading advocate for payment transparency in hospitality and played a key role in driving industry reform around OTA virtual card fees in Australia.
READ: RMS pioneers integration with SiteMinder’s Smart Platform
Its just a rort what these OTA`S getaway with. For discussion –
What is the current ruling with rate parity? Can we set our own advertised rates 16% – %26 less than the OTA`S or will they kick us off their platform?
Can we advertise our rates then when sent to the OTA`S can we put a multiplier on them ?
Hi Zane,
OTAs don’t really need to boot you off their platform (especially in bigger cities) they just reduce your visibility to near zero. In smaller towns where there is only a small number of properties, there is less effect if they try to reduce your visibility.
From a business perspective (and this comment is probably not going to be appreciated), it is your choice to be on each OTA – you can choose to list or not list on Booking.com, as they can choose to list or not list with you. If they are paying high ad costs through Google, then they should be able to set some requirements to be on their site. Where this turns into a joke is that they ask for parity, then discount on their side to lower than your rate.
It is always worth first approaching the Rate Parity challenges with a basic membership program, which can be set up in 1-3 hours with a basic email signup. There are a few stipulations in the Booking.com Terms – the membership needs to be behind a password, this is ticked by only providing the membership code to people via email, the next one is the guest must have stayed with you before to get access to the membership rate – this one is a bit harder to tick off. I think unlikely to get penalised with this setup in place.
Monitor your ranking, monitor your Booking Mix Ratios. After running the program (Give it a fairly decent period) if you notice big drops in OTA mix, it might be a signal. Keep in mind that different times of the year will have different booking source mixes.
This is going to have a significant effect on management rights operators who will essentially have to on charge the fees to owners in the letting pool, which will not make us popular so has an effect on us, making their ROI less.
The OTA commissions are just astronomical, and all the government has to do is ban them and then help build a direct booking portal with little to no commissions/fees (if anything it goes into the budget to maintain the portal) and then they also have control over guest reviews, registration etc.
HI ZANE,
Simply use different rates.
Always have a direct rate from your website and calling direct. Also better cancellation terms
Travel agents add 10 % to their GDS rate
OTA’s add 15%
Travel agents are ok as long as you are cheaper than OTA’s.
OTA’s only get angry is Booking is less than Expedia. Doesn’t hurt to play with them a bit, just for fun to annoy them. They do actually need your business!!
If you are still getting a lot of bookings from OTA’s your prices are too low and you have been underselling yourself all along. You will be amazed what happens when you do the above. You will make loads more money and never be angry again at an OTA booking, because they have more money than sense. Not your problem any more!
This is the truth from an owner operator not someone trying to sell you some program or OTA !