Direct bookings vs OTAs: What Europe says

In April, Independent Hotel Show Amsterdam and Avvio conducted a research project to explore how the industry feels about the inevitable rise of online travel agencies (OTAs).

Nearly 150 hotels participated in the project, together accounting for millions of online bookings each year.

In general, the OTAs are considered an important part of the marketing mix, however the frustration regarding high commissions means the vast majority of hotels take the stimulation of direct bookings very seriously.

The questionnaire

Responses came from the Netherlands, UK, Belgium and Germany, with more than sixty percent of the participants being hotel owners or managers. Other respondents are involved with reservations on a daily basis.

Almost a third of the hoteliers own more than a hundred rooms and a large number say they own more than fifty rooms. Three-quarters of the hotels are managed independently and responsible for their own revenue or yield management.

Hoteliers are working hard to encourage direct bookings; seventy percent admit that they take securing as many direct bookings as possible seriously or very seriously.

And the main driver of this seems to be the commissions charged by booking sites; the majority find these rates unacceptable.

The top ten frustrations

1. Big players are able to monopolise the market
2. Commissions have risen to an unacceptable level
3. A marketplace is controlled by dotcom companies without a hotel heart
4. ‘Rate parity’ means there is no freedom to adjust prices yourself
5. The position and ranking of independent hotels are weak in next to the large chains
6. Slow response for questions from front office, with direct guest contact impossible when it comes to check in
7. Their dominance on Google and the effect on individual hotel websites – some hoteliers feel OTAs should not be allowed to buy individual hotel name in Google Ads.
8. Public perception is that they get the best deal through the booking sites
9. Offering prepaid rooms without indicating that this cannot be cancelled
10. Booking sites failing to take into account the cancellation terms of hotels

Cooperating with the OTAs

Almost all the hoteliers surveyed work together with booking sites and realise the benefits. Only six percent refuse to receive bookings via OTAs because of excessive commissions.

From the 94 percent of the hotels that receive reservations via OTAs, more than 60 percent think that booking sites ensure a structured offer for the hotel guest that can be easily compared by timing and region.

Despite the high commissions, OTAs bring hotel guests from all over the world and more than half of the hoteliers acknowledge they can save on marketing costs due to the international reach of OTAs.

Also, a large majority (60 percent) of the hoteliers say they also rely on the booking sites to check prices of their competitors.

Meeting in middle?

58 percent of the respondents think a mix of 70 percent direct bookings and 30 percent OTA bookings is optimal as almost half of the hotels consider the commission of the hotels as unacceptably high, especially when it comes to returning hotel guests.

Hoteliers often assess communication with OTAs as ‘neutral’, which is also the outcome on the question of how they feel these companies handle guest data.

Securing your own bookings

Hoteliers put a lot of energy into the content of their own websites in order to improve the findability (with 73 percent stating this is how they hope to secure more direct bookings).

Having a ‘best price guarantee’ on the site is then the most popular promotion used to stimulate direct bookings (71 percent) followed by incentives such as a welcome drink, late check-out and a discount for repeat bookings (70 percent). More than half of the respondents utilise loyalty programs to maintain direct contact with guests.

Almost 65 percent believe in promoting rooms directly through social media and 50 percent also use email marketing campaigns, aimed at returning guests.

For their social media channels, 60 percent say Facebook has been most effective followed by Instagram (33 percent).

See original article here

Anastasia Yates